Ohio Passes Bill Asbestos Specified Disclosures Bill
By Madeline May |
Learn how Ohio’s Senate Bill 63 introduces new legal challenges for mesothelioma victims seeking justice for asbestos exposure and discover what these changes mean for asbestos lawsuits and how they may impact veterans, families, and workers across the state.

How an Ohio Asbestos Bill (Senate Bill 63) Would Impact Mesothelioma Lawsuits
In late 2024, Ohio lawmakers passed Senate Bill 63, introducing significant changes for individuals filing asbestos-related lawsuits. The bill requires plaintiffs to provide detailed information about exposure, including worksites, products, dates, and witnesses, within 60 days of filing. Failing to meet these requirements could lead to case dismissal. Proponents argue the law will protect businesses from unfounded lawsuits, while critics fear it creates unfair barriers for victims seeking justice.
Ohio’s long history of asbestos-related industries like rubber plants, steel mills, refineries, and more—has made asbestos exposure a critical public health issue. Understanding how Senate Bill 63 may impact legal claims is essential for affected individuals and families. Read on to learn more about the Ohio asbestos bill and how it could affect people diagnosed with mesothelioma.
Supporters of the Bill: Protecting Businesses and Preventing Lawsuits
The bill’s supporters assert that these disclosure requirements will streamline legal proceedings and reduce frivolous claims, sparing businesses from undue litigation. According to Ohio Senator George Lang, the lead sponsor, the bill aims to curb the “overnaming” of defendants, which can drive up legal costs for companies uninvolved in asbestos exposure cases.
Supporters believe the changes ensure fairness by demanding evidence early in the process, making it easier to identify truly responsible asbestos parties. Ohio’s insurance associations and business groups echo these sentiments, emphasizing that the legislation clarifies an otherwise complex legal landscape.
Critics of the Bill: Creating Unfair Barriers for Asbestos Victims
However, critics argue the bill unfairly burdens victims, who may not have immediate access to detailed exposure information. Mesothelioma, a disease caused by asbestos exposure, can take up to 70 years to develop, making it difficult for victims to recall specific exposure details or gather the necessary evidence within 60 days. Critics argue that the bill may prevent legitimate claims from moving forward, stripping victims of their constitutional right to seek compensation. David Root, a lobbyist for the Veterans of Foreign Wars, emphasized the bill’s potential impact on veterans and their families, stating:
“Senate Bill 63 might work for someone who worked in an asbestos plant for 20 years… but it does not work for the surviving family member of a deceased veteran. A veteran and their family members should have the same right to file a tort action lawsuit as anyone else.”
What’s Next for the Ohio Asbestos Bill?
Senate Bill 63 has returned to the Ohio Senate for a final vote following amendments by the House aimed at easing disclosure requirements and granting judges more discretion. If approved, the bill will head to Governor Mike DeWine for potential enactment. The future of asbestos claims and lawsuits in Ohio remains uncertain, with advocates continuing to push for fair legal protections for mesothelioma victims.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related illness in Ohio, understanding the implications of Senate Bill 63 is crucial. This legislation could impact your ability to pursue legal claims and secure compensation. At Lung Cancer Center, we connect you with experienced asbestos attorneys who can help you navigate these legal challenges, gather necessary evidence, and advocate for your rights under the new guidelines. Don’t let new legal hurdles stand in the way of justice. Contact our team today to discuss your case and learn how we can help you secure the compensation you deserve.